Scanning through the offered seminars today, I came across an entry that I've already mostly missed (in part because my office hourse):
Between 2:15pm and 3:15pm today, Professor Doron Zeilberger of Rutgers University offers "an elegant and insightful direct combinatorial proof of the arithmetical identity 4+5 = 2+7."For the abstract, he wrote:
There are no trivial theorems, only trivial mathematicians (those who believe that there exist trivial theorems). Being a non-trivial mathematician myself, I will present a new, elegant, and very insightful direct combinatorial proof of the seemingly (to most people) "trivial" arithmetical theorem that states that four plus five equals two plus seven. More important, the methodology should extend to give insightful direct combinatorial proofs of even deeper identities, like (4+6+200+6+50)+(3+10+30+5)=300+4+10.
That has me intrigued. So I decided to go and look up who Doron Zeilberger is. As far as I can find out, he is famous for hypergeometric summation identities, outrageous quotes, and attention grabbing talks. For example, in 2007, he gave a talk to undergraduates at Rutgers University with the absolutely shortest possible title in any language, natural or artificial.
In addition to that, he has opinions, lots of them, lots more than I do anyhow. I admire his personality and bravado, though I don't think I agree with everything he says (especially on the use of computers in mathematics and on mathematics being an experimental science; though it pains me to admit that my most recent works are in fact inspired by explicit calculations that I performed with the aid of Mathematica).
One of the things Professor Zeilberger is well-known for, is his friend and co-author Shalosh B. Ekhad. It reminds me of F.D.C. Willard, the first cat (his name is short for Felix Domesticus Chester Willard) to publish in the physical review letters. Of course, anthropomophizing a computer is nothing new. My first website was ran by my laptop, then known as Willetta. Sortir en Pantoufles also used to keep her own blog under the name Virtrude Stein. (I will not provide a hyperlink here, since I haven't completely ported that to my current website. Let me give a sample of her writings
ale additional holiday elopingor
Thinking to the publication 's cocoa white-hatted in there must be probably back creating and still who is the wedding with this chronicler to a autumn. The next preferable patient and essential and bewildered and made wedding-times lifestyle-based and tout fishing. No which refers caf alternative pushes me new from there is the treasure of _polonia_ and more between the, campaign as poem. The piece occasions from the hidden which is to visit there is recovery. Charge the formats.
l deductible formidableIf the rhythm of the above paragraphs sound familiar, this is because the grammatical structure of each entry parallels that of entries from Gertrude Stein's Tender Buttons. What I said about this project way back when:
Curve is beside carriage, i comes enthusiastically dance that clear worsted, anyway thin itself has been settled but opposition has been understood off neither because before that has been filled there is many counting, every decision is indicated neither composed up, much both recurrence is mussed specially near claiming well is peaceful. Pet boom is awkward less simpler, louder is altogether unordered without notwithstanding but into next there is many closer petting is really sincerely between sac from it. Quiet quiver. No nearest coal is outside which is resolute or venturing. Another price, it is many noisy bow nearly is used with that pierce being longer. No stretch that is round why neither dining is shaded and thought is under those moist care notwithstanding this paper there are one that have circular accounts. Clash. Let the signal and measure it, add they. Done uttermost, to be respected trimmed, to be bought bought, to be hanging within way or center, neither abundant pond that is closed which is hardly loving or mental bolts, to be mixed stomachs complain leave that old fish less near any ham for delay.
Fifty, two and eight, fifteen, three, red neither nine or because. All music is directly another fact. Express some loose call, winningly and best before spark, rudeness in as on.
The that was always well a subject was stationary. No dinner stretch, itself faces no strange ticket under period, we lacks more without another, we soothes preparing music, itself addresses less as another, them discloses uselessly read cracking some willow. What is another cake, what is they. Correction, leisure is beside another sounder neither from rain before.
The piece of work was a failure for its original purpose impersonating (via an inanimate object) the genius of Gertrude Stein and thus was relegated (by a disappointed artist) to reinterpret and resurrect the Dadaist practice of cutting up a newspaper article and throwing the words in a bag and pulling them out at random to leave the act of composition up to chance, except that in the present case the bag is replaced by 53 different hats and that the process involves carefully categorizing each word of the 10 articles chosen from the internet (sharing a common thread as deemed appropriate by Google) by its grammatical function into a specific hat and drawing them out from the hats in an order deemed grammatically "correct" in the sense of Tender Buttons. And that the author is now a computer.and so that's that.)
In any case, Doron Zeilberger sounds like a swell guy. Wish I did go to his seminar.