A little pentagon theorem
2007.01.10
Mathematics, Pictures/Images

I came up with the following little question while randomly doodling on a piece of paper.

TheoremGiven a pentagon ABCDE, for a given side, we call the diagonal of the pentagon which does not share a vertex with the side opposite, e.g. the opposite diagonal for the side AB would be the segment CE. If ABCDE has the property that every pair of side and its opposite diagonal are parallel, then ABCDE is, up to an affine transform, the regular pentagon.

As an illustration (for the theorem as well for the proof that follows), we show The geometric object in question. The condition in the theorem says that if AB is parallel to PQ, BC to QR, CD to RS, DE to ST, and EA to TP, then we can find an affine transform that takes ABCDE to a regular pentagon. (A quick reminder, affine transforms are the linear transforms of the plane plus the translations, so we are allowed to rotate, scale, skew/sear the picture, as well as translate it.)

Proof (The essential step in the proof is due to my office mate Pin Yu.) Since we are proving for equivalence up to affine transforms (note that a fundamental property of affine transforms is that they preserve parallels), we can, without loss of generality, assume that: the lengths AE = ED = DC and the angles AED = EDC. (We can first skew the image parallel to the segment ED via an affine transform such that the angles are as described, then we can take a one dimensional scaling in the direction perpendicular to ED such that the lengths AE = CD are scaled to equal the length of ED.)

It remains to show that every such pentagon is the regular pentagon. To do so:

  1. By construction, CDES is a parallelgram, and in fact, a rhombus. Therefore the angles ECD = ECS = CES = CED
  2. Since ATDE is a similar rhombus to CSED, the angles ECD = TAD = EAD = EDA = TDA
  3. Using the fact that AB is parallel to EC, the angle ABE = BEC, and similarly BAC = ACE, CBD = BDA, BCA = CAD.
  4. By parallelisms, we can also say that the angles AEB = EBD = BDC.
Our conclusion is best understood using the following image Second image of construction where the "a" and "b" denotes angle sizes. (Of course, the picture is not to scale, since the angles are only equal after the affine transform mentioned previously.)

So it remains to show that angle b = angle a. (And here's Pin's key insight.)

Look at the triangles ABC and AED, they are similar by the AAA rule. So we must have the ratio

AE / AB = AD / AC
But AE and AB are both sides of the triangle ABE, so by the law of sines
sin a / sin b = AE / AB
Similarly, we get
AD / AC = sin(2a) / sin (a+b)
Working out the math, we have
sin a (sin a cos b + sin b cos a) = 2 sin a cos a sin b
and so
sin a cos b - sin b cos a = sin (a-b) = 0
and hence a = b. Q.E.D.
Posted at 12:01:14 EST by W comment

blogCentralFront Page
2009.11.20 00:41:20 GMT Feynman's Messenger Lectures online Just found out something rather cool: Microsoft Research, through Project Tuva, is publishing videos of Richard Feynman's Messenger Lectures. Go watch.
2009.11.18 11:05:07 GMT Alcohol consumption Different cultures certainly have different views on alcohol. For example, at Hertford College Oxford, wine is allowed if reasonably drunk and 4) A small amount of beer or lager will be allowed wher
2009.11.16 19:17:31 GMT Luc visits; Willie doesn't check e-mail Holy cow! I just realized that I spent a day at work without checking e-mail! Okay, to be honest, today I was hosting Luc Nguyen, who we invited to speak on his work about the regularity near the sing
2009.11.15 18:19:32 GMT Chicken soup Chicken soup is not just good for the soul. It has been scientifically proven to mitigate inflammation. Maybe mommy's chicken soup was the reason that the same bug that took Pin out of commission for
2009.11.10 17:58:53 GMT Sayonara, e-nibbles; hullo, Gee-Mi-Ni It's final: e-nibbles is no more. e-nibbles was my trusty Dell D600 which I purchased summer after my Junior year in college through the Student Computer Initiative. Immediately after receiving the ob
2009.09.30 10:12:57 BST Ahhh! Cruft discovered in pre-print. Ack, I should've known better. I stayed up a bit later on Monday night than I intended to. I was asked, by Claude, last week, about whether certain cases (in particular the Born-Infeld model) not cove
2009.09.28 18:30:27 BST Spiders spiders everywhere Wow! Third post today, and here I thought I have been neglecting my blog. Anyway, it turns out that I am not the only person to have noticed the large number of spiders in Britain this autumn. Going o
2009.09.28 15:12:09 BST Causality of generalized wave-maps--paper on arXiv Oh, almost forgot. New paper on arXiv. Gary Gibbons showed via explicit computations using eigenvalues that the Skyrmion equation obeys the dominant energy condition. In my paper, I proved the dominan
2009.09.28 14:42:39 BST The evolution debate as an illustration of speciation I was reading some article or another in Wired, which happens to be about dinosaurs. And of course, the religious kooks came out of the woodwork to attack evolution on the comment board. And it occurr
2009.09.02 12:42:44 BST New beginnings: first days at Cambridge Heh. Did you, dear reader, notice the change on the date-stamp for the previous entry? It was posted in British Standard Time. Yes, I am now taking a position in the Department of Pure Mathematics and