Naughtiness in the English Language
2005.09.21
Humour, Linky!, Natural Sciences

An article appeared in the New York Times titled Almost before we spoke, we swore. It reports on scientific inquiry to the social/linguistic/neurological significances of cursing. According to the article, the effect of seeing/hearing curse words is similar to that of seeing offensive/strong/sexual images: people will be "blinded" by the "strong" thoughts and unable to process items that are near those objects either temporally or spatially. For example, in a test, the researcher flashes a series of images at a subject, the subject is asked to pick out the picture that is placed upside down (the pictures are usually landscape, and easy to tell which is the right side up). If immediately before the "wrong" picture the researcher flashes a picture of human entrails, many subjects would be "blinded" for a short while after seeing the image and unable to catch the subsequent target image. In the test presented in the article, the subjects are given a list of words to memorize. The researchers find that words immediately preceding and following profanities just seem to fall out of the subjects' memories, whereas the profanities themselves are most clearly remembered.

And another interesting fact as most college students probably already know, the free flow of foul language between friends can often signal peace and tranquility, rather than hostility.

A bit of fun statistic:

The investigators have found, among other things, that men generally curse more than women, unless said women are in a sorority, and that university provosts swear more than librarians or the staff members of the university day care center.

On slashdot, we see the following comment* by wizwormathorne (760340):

"Nothing" in Shakespeare

It's not "an O Thing" that the title is referring to (which is totally ridiculous). The title is a reference to two things. "Noting" (as another poster replied) - which is insignificant conversation and "Nothing" which IS a polite bit of Shakespearean slang which can (and usually does) refer to the female genitalia. The pun on "nothing" is perhaps most obvious in a conversation in Shakespeare's Hamlet with Ophelia:

Hamlet: Lady, shall I lie in your lap?
[Lying down at Ophelia's feet.]
Ophelia: No, my lord.
Hamlet: I mean, my head upon your lap?
Ophelia: Ay, my lord.
Ham.: Do you think I meant country matters?
Oph.: I think nothing, my lord.
Ham.: That's a fair thought to lie between maids' legs.
Oph.: What is, my lord?
Ham.: Nothing.

Incidentally, Much Ado About Nothing is about both the effects "casual" conversation and the implications of real and perceived sexual relationships.
A quick search on Google seems to confirm that assertion. According to Renegade Comedy's Study Guide for Much Ado About Nothing:
Shakespeare receives three gold stars for this title. In early modern English, "nothing" would be pronounced "noting." "Nothing" could mean "nothing;" "nothing" could denote "noting" or eavesdropping; "nothing" was also a slang term for female genitalia, which was "nothing" compared to what a man had. So, the play revolves around instances of deception and eavesdropping coupled with sexual politics. The basic action of the play is hide and overhear.

Now I wish that there's a list of such words so I can actually understand more of the hidden meanings in Shakespeare.

While we are on the subject of the Brits and naughty words, here's a fun bit from yahoo news concerning a village in Austria named Fucking. It seems that the town is annoyed at all the British tourists who goes around stealing their town signs. But they can't very well claim innocence to the use of that word in the English language. Here's the official website of the village. I am pretty sure they were quite happy at using its illustrative name as a tourist attraction up until the point their signs get stolen. For those of you with no German knowledge, the name is not pronounced the same way as the gerund of the English vulgar verb for fornication; it should be pronounced closer to "fooking" (there's no sound for it in English really, it is halfway between the "oo" as in "book" in English, and the "u" as in "yu", the pin-yi for the Chinese character for jade... very close to the French "u"). (Oh, and the hamlet is at 48' 03"N 13' 51"E.)

* The comment resides at http://science.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=162871&cid=13611372. Due to some silliness in my coding, I cannot have unescaped ampersands in my blog entries, and the above url, if included in a standard <a> tag would cause the update to fail. I should probably try fixing it sometime soon, but now school started and my attention are on courses.

Posted at 16:59:00 EDT by W comment

blogCentralFront Page
2009.11.20 00:41:20 GMT Feynman's Messenger Lectures online Just found out something rather cool: Microsoft Research, through Project Tuva, is publishing videos of Richard Feynman's Messenger Lectures. Go watch.
2009.11.18 11:05:07 GMT Alcohol consumption Different cultures certainly have different views on alcohol. For example, at Hertford College Oxford, wine is allowed if reasonably drunk and 4) A small amount of beer or lager will be allowed wher
2009.11.16 19:17:31 GMT Luc visits; Willie doesn't check e-mail Holy cow! I just realized that I spent a day at work without checking e-mail! Okay, to be honest, today I was hosting Luc Nguyen, who we invited to speak on his work about the regularity near the sing
2009.11.15 18:19:32 GMT Chicken soup Chicken soup is not just good for the soul. It has been scientifically proven to mitigate inflammation. Maybe mommy's chicken soup was the reason that the same bug that took Pin out of commission for
2009.11.10 17:58:53 GMT Sayonara, e-nibbles; hullo, Gee-Mi-Ni It's final: e-nibbles is no more. e-nibbles was my trusty Dell D600 which I purchased summer after my Junior year in college through the Student Computer Initiative. Immediately after receiving the ob
2009.09.30 10:12:57 BST Ahhh! Cruft discovered in pre-print. Ack, I should've known better. I stayed up a bit later on Monday night than I intended to. I was asked, by Claude, last week, about whether certain cases (in particular the Born-Infeld model) not cove
2009.09.28 18:30:27 BST Spiders spiders everywhere Wow! Third post today, and here I thought I have been neglecting my blog. Anyway, it turns out that I am not the only person to have noticed the large number of spiders in Britain this autumn. Going o
2009.09.28 15:12:09 BST Causality of generalized wave-maps--paper on arXiv Oh, almost forgot. New paper on arXiv. Gary Gibbons showed via explicit computations using eigenvalues that the Skyrmion equation obeys the dominant energy condition. In my paper, I proved the dominan
2009.09.28 14:42:39 BST The evolution debate as an illustration of speciation I was reading some article or another in Wired, which happens to be about dinosaurs. And of course, the religious kooks came out of the woodwork to attack evolution on the comment board. And it occurr
2009.09.02 12:42:44 BST New beginnings: first days at Cambridge Heh. Did you, dear reader, notice the change on the date-stamp for the previous entry? It was posted in British Standard Time. Yes, I am now taking a position in the Department of Pure Mathematics and